Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED]

Update [2008-2-15 12:30:34 by Larr Johnson]: We used TinyUrl to make all of the links available to you because MyDD's software doesn't allow the ID tag within URLs.

As Democrats and Independents weigh who they want to run against John McCain in the fall, answer this question.  Can you support a candidate who is friends with terrorists?  Can you support a candidate who takes money from terrorists?  Well, if Obama is your man you have some problems.  Today's Bloomberg News drops this bombshell:

Besides Rezko and Giannoulias, Obama could face questions about his  relationship with William Ayers, a former member of the radical group the  Weather Underground who is now a professor of education at the University of  Illinois in Chicago. Ayers donated $200 in 2001 to Obama's Illinois state Senate  campaign and served with him from 1999 to 2002 on the board of the Woods Fund,  an anti-poverty group.

A Series of Bombings

The Weather Underground carried out a series of bombings in the early 1970s  -- including the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon. While Ayers was never prosecuted  for those attacks, he told the New York Times in an interview published Sept.  11, 2001, that ``I don't regret setting bombs.''

Bill Burton, Obama's spokesman, said Ayers ``does not have a role on the  campaign.'' Ayers said he had no comment on his relationship with Obama.

Does not have a role on the campaign?   Well thank God for that.  Are you kidding me?

Peter Hitchens was the first to hint at this relationship, but Tim Burger nails it.  William Ayers is an American terrorist.  What else do you call someone who plants bombs at Federal facilities?  William Ayers has not been prosecuted for the bombings, but he was directly involved.  

He admits this.  And do not give me the nonsense that he was fighting for a good cause.  Martin Luther King's message of non-violence had no place in the political ideology of Mr. Ayers.  And Ayers is unrepentant.

First, Ayers contributed money to Obama.

Your search found 1 receipts totaling $200.00











Contributed By Amount Received By Description
Ayers, William
1329 E. 50th Street
Chicago, IL 60615
$200.00   4/2/2001 Individual Contribution

Friends of Barack Obama.

Second, this is more than a casual acquaintance.  Obama and Ayers served together on the board of the Woods Fund.  Did Obama and Ayers do more than simply sit side-by-side?  Did they steer money to favored groups?  Those are questions that journalists not bowing at the feet of the Obama god need to ask.

At a minimun this reminds us that there is a pattern of bad judgment by Obama.  He goes in on a land deal with Tony Rezko even though he knows Rezko is a target of a Federal investigation.  And his explanation?  A mistake in judgment.  Now this.  Anyone thinking of running for President should know they cannot take money from a terrorist and they cannot serve on a board with a terrorist.  Period.  But this simple lesson apparently escapes the brilliant constitutional law professor.

This much we do know.  Obama does not deny having a relationship with William Ayers.  Obama has never repudiated the terrorism of William Ayers.  If you think this is a record Obama can run on in the fall and survive you are living in an alternate universe.  It is time to get some clear answers to tough questions before the Democrats sell their soul to someone whose lapses in judgment will come back to  haunt them in the fall.



Display:


Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (2.00 / 0)

This is right wing talking points.


by tom32182 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:21:55 AM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (2.00 / 5)

This is MILD compared to how the GOP will attempt to massacre Obama in the GE.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:26:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

And there it is (2.00 / 0)

HRC has had it all already and is still around.  The GOP couldn't swiftboat her with a supertanker.  Obama?  Nothing, he has had absolutely nothing thrown at him, not even from the Clinton campaign regardless of what the Obama crazies say the big, bad Clintons have done.


by linc on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:00:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: And there it is (1.00 / 0)

Um, the damage is already done to Hillary, she's alrady unelectable in the general.


by Socraticsilence on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:01:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (2.00 / 3)

RIGHTWING?  How old are you???   I am old enough to vividly remember the terrorism of William Ayers and his Weather Underground allies -- who also set about to DESTROY the peaceful, Martin Luther King-style of Vietnam War protests.  They advocate the violent overthrow of the U.S. government.  They stockpiled large caches of weapons, and were in league with other underground terrorist groups.

And Ayers is unrepentant to this day.  He is a extremist asshole who got away -- and raised his terrorist pal Bernadine Dorhn's son while she was in prison.  He offers NO apologies for his behavior or for his views.  He is still a dangerous radical -- moreso because he has transformed himself into an academic acceptable on campuses.

I protested the Vietnam War mightily, and paid some heavy personal prices for it.... no need to get into all that here.  I was incredibly distraught with the violent turn of some of the movement, led by the likes of Ayers, who continues to spew his venomous hatred of all things American to this day.


by susanhu on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:44:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Yes, Right Wing BS (none / 0)

I have to agree with this.  I don't see anything damning here, except for the usual RW talking points (guilt by association).  I'm sure that the GOP will hold it against him in the fall, but that doesn't mean it should influence our votes in the primary season.

I am not at all a fan of the Weather Underground either, let me note.  I think they did major damage to progressive movement back in the day.  In fact, I suspect that the Weather Underground could be considered one of the "excesses of the 60s and 70s" that Obama disliked, apparently.

Heh, anyway.  


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:51:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I don't disagree with you (none / 0)

but watch the GOP make this an issue.  Obama is untested and this just proves it.


by linc on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:06:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Um... I guarantee this is not an issue (none / 0)

It will be talk radio not TV


I believe in Hillary
by sonofdonkeykong on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:16:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Um... I guarantee this is not an issue (none / 0)

Do you really think that they communicate with their base through TV ads?   Hint: no.


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:17:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

I know them and they're better people than most of the scumbags on this website regardless of their youthful radical activities. You'd be on the side of the British if we were in colonial America I'm sure.


by illlaw1 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 07:12:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Compared to Hillary, Obama IS a Saint (none / 0)

Jiminy Christmas!  Now who's playing the right wing guilt by association talking points?  


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:52:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Compared to Hillary, Obama IS a Saint (1.00 / 0)

Wait, how is his list Bullshit? The tie to Hsu is far more substantial than the Ayers thing, and the FALN thing is far more damaging.


by Socraticsilence on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:03:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Compared to Hillary, Obama IS a Saint (none / 0)

your hate for obama, who has run the most positive campaign in recent history and gotten so many new people involved says something very bad about you. I think you need help.


by affratboy22 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:25:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (2.00 / 4)

MyDD software needs to be modified to allow ID format. Great find from Bloomberg, Larry.


I'm United Methodist. I already have a Messiah.
by KnowVox on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:25:58 AM EST

LOL (none / 0)

This is pathetic.  So you serve on the board of a poverty organization with someone and that makes you in league all of their most nefarious activities? Even McCain isn't dumb enough to try to use this against Obama.  I'm sure they'll have better stuff than this.


by bigdcdem on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:26:04 AM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

Jesus Christ, you have got to be fucking kidding me.  How old are you????  

This must have been around 1970 (i.e. over 35 years ago), in a crazy time you likely have no idea about whatsoever.  The guy is now a PROFESSOR OF EDUCATION AT A UNIVERSITY!!!!  Better hope somebody doesn't go scraping around the contributor rolls for Hillary's campaign--no doubt some similar "terrorists" to be found there as well.  

Really, really inane post.  You should be ashamed of this.    


by paul minot on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:29:29 AM EST

Oh, really? (1.75 / 4)

Do you really think John McCain & the GOP will stay away from this? Guess again. If they could rip apart war hero John Kerry with the "Swift Boat" ads, just think of what they will do with this! I can already see the "Obama supports terrorists!" lines coming out with visuals of old Weather Underground photos. Really, this isn't good for him.


No way, no how, no McCain! :-)
by atdleft on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:35:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Oh, really? (none / 0)

Let me say, as a Clinton supporter: I am sure that they will do all this to BHO, but they will also tar and feather HRC.   It's going to be ugly no matter who the nominee is, and we're going to need to be united when that onslaught comes.


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:31:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

Lots of people who were radicals 30 years ago are part of the mainstream today, and these connections to Obama are really, really tenuous.  I'm totally unmoved by this one.


"Another problem we have...is that in election years we behave somewhat as primitive peoples do at the time of the full moon." --Harry Truman
by Steve M on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:36:35 AM EST

That dog won't hunt (none / 0)

I guess?  We can thank Larry Johnson for giving us a preview of likely Republican attacks in the GE.

But really, if this (and the Rezco stuff) is all they can find on Obama, I'd say Obama's in pretty good shape.


Nobody's right if everybody's wrong --Stephen Stills "For What It's Worth"
by vj on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:38:48 AM EST

Re: That dog won't hunt (none / 0)

Yeah the drug stuff killed Bush and Clinton.

It's going to be a bloodbath...


by labor nrrd on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:26:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That dog won't hunt (none / 0)

the drug stuff, that will be huge to? Your hate for Obama BLINDS you.  Why dont you quit all this and just say "i hate Obama more than Osama even though their both the same" several hundred times a day and maybe you'll have less time for insane comments like this.  And yeah, i'm sure Hillary's list has more than a few we could take out of context.


by affratboy22 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:31:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That dog won't hunt (none / 0)

GET HELP then VOTE OBAMA!  


by affratboy22 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 07:55:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That dog won't hunt (none / 0)

you STILL trying to bring up his drug use is well LAME (please attempt to run on her issues which you claim she's so wonderful with) and why can you not be for someone without being part of a cult?  I dont discredit you for your support of Hillary, i discredit your irrational hatred of Obama


by affratboy22 on Mon Feb 18, 2008 at 07:54:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Interesting (2.00 / 2)

Not enough to condemn Obama yet but whats very problematic is the no comment from the Obama campaign.


by world dictator on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:41:48 AM EST

Re: What is there to say? (none / 0)

non responsive to the point I was making. try again


by world dictator on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:03:44 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Interesting (none / 0)

No a comment would be troubling.

LBJ told an aide to spread a rumor about a rival sleeping with sheep.  His aide responded that no one would believe, LBJ said yeah but the SOB might be dumb enough to deny it.


by labor nrrd on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:27:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What is there to say? (none / 0)

Fucking poor people!


by illlaw1 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 07:14:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (2.00 / 3)

Haven't you learned the lessons of the past 10 years? Rove and Republicans go after candidates with negative attacks on their strengths. They turned Max Cleland, a war hero, into an abettor of terrorists, and turned Kerry, also a war hero, into a coward. They aren't going to go after Obama with some obscure connections to the Chicago political scene. That's too ho-hum for the media. Look at Obama's strengths and that's where you'll see where the Republican smear-machine will take aim.


McCain sides with Bush against war veterans
by jeffbinnc on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:46:59 AM EST

Re: What do you think they will do to Hillary? (none / 0)

Naw.  It's Obama supporters who are deploying right wing talking points against HRC, and have been from the start.  Some Clinton supporters are obviously doing it to BHO, now.  Both are wrong.  You get zero points for consistency.  


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:54:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hardly - Rezko was the first shot (none / 0)

Meh.  I can defend the Rezko shot as an attack from the left, too.  The dude was bad.  He had poor folks staying in buildings in Chicago with no heat!  

Note: I don't blame him for that.  Moreover, it's clear to me that BOTH have done heavy lifting for corporations, but have been generally positive/more progressive than that initial cursory glance would suspect.  Clinton didn't defend unions to Wal-Mart, but she didn't do heavy union busting, either.  And she encouraged them in areas where she thought she could get them to move - on women's issues, on the environment.  These aren't huge victories, but they are net positives, whereever you sit.

Please show me the heavy lifting Obama has done for unions?  Did Michelle Obama push the Wal-Mart supplier on whose board she sat to unionize?  No?  Should I hold that against her?

I agree that some Clinton supporters are trying to knee-cap him; I think that others have a fair point - HRC's negatives are high because she has been through this before.  I do not believe that they can get much higher (except when Obama surrogates spend significant amounts of time calling Clinton all but racist).  Obama's negatives are low - and they WILL get higher regardless of what happens in the primaries.  Clinton's negatives are high because the RWNM defined her, just as it will gear up to define Obama.  Touting his low negatives before he has without those smears is kind of silly.  That argument is really a wash.

I'm not a big fan of these posts.  I'm not concerned about this issue; I agree, it is mostly a non-issue.  It would be more of a non-issue if there were fewer Obama supporters (and surrogates) touting his lack of negatives compared to HRC without understanding that he has yet to be defined by the opposition, so we don't know how that will happen.  In the end, I suspect that his negatives will be at or near Clinton's negatives, especially with Republican base voters.


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:14:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: I'm not a big fan of these either (none / 0)

I suppose I'm part of the Hillary blogosphere, and I'm not dedicated to raising those accusations.  I think they are over the top, and mostly try not to read them.  I read this one mostly out of trepidation, with the intent of speaking up.

Though I do disagree with you on the race-baiting issue.  I think Obama and surrogates pushed that issue pretty hard, overinterpreting scattered comments in a way that painted the Clintons into a corner.  I don't believe that the Clintons painted themselves into that corner, by the way - yeah, there were unfortunate gaffes, but once Obama threw out the Clinton-as-racist meme, they had no way to defend themselves.    

I suppose I could call that political hardball, but I think that exploiting racism is pretty wrong, and implying that the Clintons were trying to exploit racism is also wrong, and damaging to the party.  And it started even before those remarks, in the immediate aftermath of New Hampshire.  

That said, I think that the Barack-Attack wing of the Clinton blogosphere is considerably less visible than the "I'm divorcing the meanie Clintons!!!!!" wing of the blogosphere, and represents the views of a minority of Clinton supporters.  


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:35:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: What do you think they will do to Hillary? (none / 0)

Who's being naive now.  

You think the GOP is just going to say, well we have attacked her a lot... oh well, keeping the presidency would have been nice.

Of course they are going to come up with new shit, it's going to be a bloodbath, arghh... As people point out intellectual honesty isn't there strong suit, but doesn't appear to be that important to this diarist either.


by labor nrrd on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:30:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Of course (none / 0)

The Republicans will continue to portray her as they've always done: cold, calculating, manipulative, with a lust for power (i.e., her strengths: pragmatic legislator, competent bureaucrat, capable politician with an eagerness to promote activist government). So her vulnerability in the GE is a known known. What's Obama's?


McCain sides with Bush against war veterans
by jeffbinnc on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 03:06:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (2.00 / 1)

$200? And served on a prominent anti-poverty organization with him?

Wow! This could kill his campaign.

Well, the one good thing is that he's not part of FALN.


by Loreg on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:47:28 AM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

Thank goodness his Virginia offices haven't been raided under suspicion of financing al Qaida.


by Adam B on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 11:54:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

But all documents in his Senate and campaign offices should be subpoenaed in order to determine the extent to which Rezko has had a role in his Presidential campaign.  Documents from Michelle Obama's various offices must also be listed in any discovery petition to be drafted by Fitzgerald.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:28:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

Seriously,  
     The FALN thing is going to be a bit hard too explain if the primaries make it to PR, I mean please tell me I'm not the only one who see's the coming attempt to link the FALN getting pardoned, and the Gitmo trials?
by Socraticsilence on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:55:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Reality Check!! (2.00 / 2)

It's not Larry Johnson who is bringing this up....IT'S BLOOMBERG NEWS.  You remember the news, don't you?

So don't go pointing fingers at Larry and Susan, et al - look to the news and realize that this stuff on Obama does exist.

And if you don't think the Repugs can (and will) use it in the fall, I have a bridge I want to talk to you about.

Drug use (Obama brought that up); Rezko; UKTimes article on Obama's bagman; and this?  An interesting package of "facts" that can be made to say whatever the Repugs want it to say.  And that will be nothing good!!!


by Shazone on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:04:55 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

Good hit!  But you forgot: he went to a madrasa!  He's definitely a Muslim and will use the Koran to take the oath of office!!!!!!  And he doesn't salute the flag, in fact he loves Che Guevara!  And he's fathered two black children!

And if you don't think the Republicans will use these, you're crazy.


by jmr1948 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:08:42 PM EST

Re: The problem is - it doesn't add up to a theme (none / 0)

Dude.  Message consistency does not matter for smear attacks.  All you have to do is look at the way the progressives have reinterpreted the right wing talking points about HRC to fit their own world view.

Either: she is a crazy, polarizing librul treehugger manhater ballbuster meanie-poo who hates cats and is conniving and just wants to TAX US ALL TO DEATH AND TURN US INTO COMMUNIST VILLAGE PEEPS whom the GOP hates;

Or: she is a corporate scumsucking shill who loves Republicans and was a Goldwater Girl and is a meanie who hates ducks and ponies and wants to institute a full corporate oligarchy with herself crowned high queen of commerce.

The two images are polar opposites, but plenty of "progressives" - especially online - embrace both.  Don't be fooled by your argument about message consistency when you are trying to imagine how the GOP will define him.  They will define him every which way but out.

**Note: I don't think that that's a reasonable reason to vote for Clinton.  But, I think that some Obama supporters are naive when they argue about Clinton's high negatives without recognizing that Obama is going to end up with reasonable-to-high negatives himself, thanks to the relentless assault of the right wing noise machine.


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:01:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Message consistency counts (none / 0)

How much time have you spent listening to RWTR?  How can HRC be a meanie lesbian AND a crazy seductress who murdered Vince Foster and had Webb Hubbell's love child?

As for the second theme - how many Democrats are concerned that she is "polarizing"?  How is "polarizing" anything other than code for "ballbusting librul"?  There are plenty of Democrats who accept and internalize the two different characterizations of Clinton without recognizing how disparate they are.  Message consistency (i.e. - repeating the same crap, ad nauseum, stupidly) does matter, but logical internal consistency of the message is much less important than you think, especially when it comes to wingnuts.  


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:23:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Message consistency counts (none / 0)

Note: wingnuts not being known for their logical consistency.  Ex. - see George W. Bush.  That is all I'm saying.


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:24:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Because she is bisexual, duh (none / 0)

That's a stretch - and yes, "polarizing" means "Republicans hate her."  Why do Republicans hate her?  Because they think she is a "ballbusting librul!"  One is shorthand for the other; I think it's intellectually dishonest to deny it.  I'll say: I think that her high negatives stem in great deal from sexist charicatures of powerful women, as well, which is why I find the polarizing argument even more troubling, especially when it's made by people on the left.  


by mgee on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:42:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (2.00 / 1)

(I'm recycling this comment from an earlier diary)

They are finally starting to lift the rocks of Obama's past and all kinds of nasty things are crawling out from under them. So far I see the most damning thing from the Burger article as:

A Series of Bombings

The Weather Underground carried out a series of bombings in the early 1970s -- including the U.S. Capitol and the Pentagon. While Ayers was never prosecuted for those attacks, he told the New York Times in an interview published Sept. 11, 2001, that ``I don't regret setting bombs.''

Bill Burton, Obama's spokesman, said Ayers ``does not have a role on the campaign.'' Ayers said he had no comment on his relationship with Obama.

Let me tell you, Republicans (the proclaimed protectors of us from us) will stress his ties to the group even if they were minimal. It will be their "IN" to turn the conversation to groups like the Black Panthers and the Revolutionary Action Movement. Obama will not be Swift Boated... the attacks will be something psychologically attuned to what happened to Harold Ford Jr in 2006.    

It is not too late for us to take a close look at his past and to see if he can hold up to the scrutiny.


by Mr Man on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:15:48 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

I originally wrote about the William Ayers-Obama connection at RezkoWatch on February 11, 2008, following Hitchens' article. Please see RezkoWatch FactChecker: Weatherman Bill Ayers for more details.


by Artificial Intelligence on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:22:30 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties (none / 0)

A $200 check written seven years ago.  Congratulations, this holds as much water as saying that John McCain was consorting with the enemy in the 1960s and 1970s.  Good god, at least be reasonable.


by Swedescott on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:23:18 PM EST

If you search McCain or Hillary... (none / 0)

Dollars to donuts you can locate a donor with a criminal background.  

After recent diaries and front page posts, makes me wonder when did Mydd become an Obama rag site?


by optimusprime on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:30:21 PM EST

Re: If you search McCain or Hillary... (none / 0)

Actually, the sad thing is you don't have to look hard, with Hillary you can find a donor (her leading fundraisier in fact) who wasn't just a crook, but was a fugitive at the time he hosted fundraisers for Hillary.


by Socraticsilence on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:58:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama is a nightmare (none / 0)

A total nightmare.  


by dpANDREWS on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:37:39 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

yawn - this is all they can come up with - no stories about Obama killing his ex lover and making it look like a suicide?  No stories about him faking being wounded to get out of combat?  This is it?  

I feel robbed, I was sure the right wing smear machine was going to make the general more enteraining than this.  


by ruskin on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:44:42 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Obama the terrorist!  lololol!!!

followed by...

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ...


by IowaCubs on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:55:42 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

This renders Obama unelectable.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:57:55 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Man, then what does the FALN, the murder of Vince Foster, an ongoing lesbian relationship with an Al Queda operative, etc. render Hillary?


by Socraticsilence on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 12:59:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Barack Obama performed political favors for Antoin Tony Rezko, an indicted slumlord who is also a political fixer.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:26:18 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

The Clinton's pardoned Cop-killing terrorists!


by Socraticsilence on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:41:50 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

You mean he sent a letter to try to help our needy community get more housing? Not that you give a shit about our community. By our, I mean mine, really, I'm from there. You don't know what you're talking about.Not that you give a shit about that either.  


by illlaw1 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:15:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: A Technical Question] (none / 0)

I'm a bit new to the concept but, is this diary a textbook example of "concern trolling"?


by ruskin on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:06:35 PM EST

There's so many different types of trolling (none / 0)

going on here, it's hard to tell up from down.
Nobody's right if everybody's wrong --Stephen Stills "For What It's Worth"
by vj on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:24:40 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

This is yet ANOTHER in a LONG string of despicable hit pieces on Obama on this site.  Think Obama can't take the GOP heat?  The Clinton smear machine, both here and in the campaign is AT LEAST as repugnant.  Where should I start?

From the Clinton campaign:

* Obama is a radical Islamist trained for jihad in a madrassa.

* Obama is a drug dealer.

* Obama is a Reaganite.

* Obama is a marginal candidate like Jesse Jackson.

* People in PA won't vote for Obama because he's black.

Here on MyDD:

* Obama did coke and had sex with gay prositutes.

* Obama is a mentally ill narcissist.

* Obama is buying the election.

* Now, Obama is a terrorist, too?

How much worse can the GOP get than this?  You people should be ashamed of yourselves.


NJ Hussein Independent
by NJIndependent on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:12:55 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

You neglected to mention Rezko, the slumlord whose business Obama assisted.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:29:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Yeah with those slumlord churches and his slumlord former boss. Comedy.

It's sad when redstaters seem smarter than you people on MyDD


by illlaw1 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:12:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

you forgot that we at MyDD tied him to Saddam Hussein via Rezko.  You saw it here first!


by mddem456 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 06:19:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Oh please!


by Drummond on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:31:46 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

And you know, even the Republicans aren't going to try to push anything like this.  What amazes me is that Clinton's supporters are acting worse than the Rovians of late.


by Drummond on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:33:34 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (2.00 / 1)

All this Clinton is invincible to the Republican attack machine is pure horse manure. Hillary has never been a candidate in a tough campaign where the stakes where high for the Republicans. She has done a lousy job of manipulating the press in the primaries and her surrogates are crying that the press are being mean to her and handing the nomination to Obama. But she's ready for the swiftboaters? Give me a break.

Over and over again I hear about Rezko. Hillary has a list of Rezko's two pages long. But you know something, it doesn't matter. Did they attack John Kerry for some connection to a shady donor or business connection? NO they attacked him for being a god damned war hero who won 3 purple hearts. The same guys who praised him in reports at the time just told bald faced lies that totally contradicted wat they said during the war and got away with it.

I don't know how either of them will handle the swiftboaters but based on Hillary's performance in the primaries I wouldn't make any claims that she is better equiped to deal with it.


by hankg on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:39:30 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Clinton is at least ELECTABLE.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:51:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

That remains to be seen. If shes ELECTABLE she will need to show it in the upcoming primaries. If she can't beat the "inexperienced rookie", she won't have a prayer in the general.


by hankg on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:56:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Hillary won all the important states.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 05:00:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

The 'important' states? You need to win more votes and more delegates period. They don't give extra points for the 'important' states. The super delegates want to line up behind a winner, they don't want to have to choose the candidate. Arm twisting won't get their support winning elections will. So I suggest you start getting voters to vote for your candidate if you want to win.


by hankg on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 07:53:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

There is no evidence of that.  She's running as a quasi-incumbent, and has difficulty with McCain, just barely a statistical tie, in most polls.  Hillary is only electable by the John Kerry metric - the same old 48% and the same old 20 states.


by mddem456 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:00:45 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

According to Survey USA polls, she is more competitive than Obama in competitive swing states.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 05:00:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Which swing states being polled matters too.  She might be more competitive in the upper midwest, but I'd imagine she'd be sunk in Western swing states like Nevada, Colorado (Montana?).

While on the subject of Robopolling, Rasmussen today has Obama +12 in NV and Clinton -9.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_c ontent/politics/election_20082/2008_pres idential_election/nevada/election_2008_n evada_presidential_election


by mddem456 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 06:16:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Link please.


by illlaw1 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 07:20:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Only in NY state.


by illlaw1 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:10:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Where's the evidence of that?


by SocialDem on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:13:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Survey USA general election polls for competitive states.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 05:01:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Typo least, not at least


by labor nrrd on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:32:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

i recommend you read and reread my comment until its full import and significance are comprehended.


by truthteller2007 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 05:01:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Pathetic.  Disgusting.  Reprehensible.  Get lost!


by mddem456 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 01:58:49 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Please keep passing this around. Even more college kids will come out to vote for Obama.


by illlaw1 on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:10:21 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Larry Johnson --

You are one despicable human being (if that's what you even are).

Sincerely,

DoubleDs


by DoubleDs on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:21:46 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

"I am just vetting him" "the GOP will say this" "He killed my puppy" "He is the one who introduced steroids into baseball"


by labor nrrd on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:33:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

Larry -

As a fellow Mizzou grad, I am embarrassed by the recent diaries you have posted on mydd. This innuendo and character assassination is despicable. Please stop. Really, a $200 donation in 2001? Pathetic.

Investigate the FALN pardons from Clinton in 1999 if you want to see who has terrorist ties. The FALN terrorists did not even request clemency and two refused the offer and chose to remain in prison. All so that HRC could curry favor with hispanics in NY. This is the story you should be covering instead of being a shill for the Clintons.  


by Lawdawg on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 02:51:46 PM EST

Re: Obama's Terrorist Ties [UPDATED] (none / 0)

As disgusting, pathetic and trollish as this diary is, what's worse is seeing the list of people who actually went out of their way to recommended it and keep it highly visible and in everyone's face.

I would suggest that the individuals who went out of their way to recommend this diary are at best trolls and at worst racist, fear mongers.

The Following Users Have Recommended This Diary:

JimR
susanhu
Gabriele Droz
atdleft
world dictator
benny06
campskunk
Universal
BigBoyBlue
truthteller2007
greenstatedem
Beltway Dem
KnowVox
owl06
linfar
Shazone
bluestate  


Hillary Clinton is not a monster,....as far as I know.. We are all Hussein JUNIOR.. ///.. FEINGOLD/BOXER 2016
by Its Like Herding Cats on Fri Feb 15, 2008 at 03:07:49 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.